Eight Crazy Wins
Yeah, maybe I do got three papers to write in the next two days. But here's why I haven't started any of them, because, well, as of seven minutes ago, I've done all the reading for all of them, and most importantly, this was a victorious weekend, people. You better act like it.
Me: Hey, man, nice return!
Brendan: Oh, thanks.
Me: (puts out hand for high five, which is grudgingly returned.)
But if there's one thing I enjoy, it's awkward shirtless conversations. When jammed with a few thousand other students in the middle of a football field, and I noticed the guy next to me was Dan Persa. So this happened.
Me: Hey, Dan Persa! (nothingness.) Thanks for the Iowa win, man!
Dan: Yeah.
l think I gave him a pat on the back, but I'm not sure. I also told some offensive lineman I was jammed up against "I'm sorry I'm not wearing a shirt." He told me not to worry about it.
- I should mention: the reason I wasn't wearing a shirt is the same reason I wasn't wearing one for the Minnesota game. The people whose house I was at were doing the chest-painting thing, and told me they needed an extra letter. By the time I got the purple base layer on, we realized they counted wrong, and that they already had enough letters. I tell you, life as an exclamation point is not a fun one. Especially because the paint from the top dripped down and just made me look like a giant lowercase l, and a splotch of paint got on my jeans zipper, making me look like I went all Lonely Island all over my Levi's. However, the lowercase l is very flattering to your form.
- By the way, it's way colder than it was back in September. You might have heard rumors that Evanston gets cold in winter, and as someone who was not wearing a shirt yesterday, I'm prepared to confirm that rumor.
- We were spelling "Kafka!" or, rather, "Kafkal". Sure enough, Kafka had a phenomenal game to end a pretty damn phenomenal stretch of football. Iron Mike hasn't thrown a pick since the Indiana game, and after spending like, eight games dinking-and-dunking with pinpoint accuracy that led to painstaking seven minute touchdown drives and moderately successful offense while overthrowing every receiver more than ten yards downfield he could (or just lofting picks), Mike has actually developed a deep passing game. A great one. In the past two games, it seems like the majority of his completions are to receivers 15-25 yards downfield. Kafka's early-season short-yardage play seems to have opened up a whole new world of downfield receivers as defenses realizes they can't let him just go to town on short routes, but also, he seems to be a more capable thrower now than he was two months ago. Kudos to Mike.
- And while we're kudosing, Andrew Brewer. Perennially open downfield, as is Sidney Stewart, but that second touchdown grab is second only to Ross Lane's good-on-Sunday's Alamo Bowl snag in catches I've seen at NU.
- And Zeke Markshausen! Everybody who saw that play went through the same thought process: "okay, screen, three yards, I'll take it." "wide receiver throw! Andrew Brewer comes through again!" "Wait, does Andrew Brewer wear #85?" "Uhhh, Zeke Markshausen can't throw. He's a wide receiver." "Wait, that guy's wide open!" And then several minutes of celebration. Great play for The Syndrome (thus called because Illinois' PA announcer last week pronounced his name "Munchausen" a bunch of times. Roll with it, even if you're not familiar with the sort of funny illness, which is made decidedly not funny by its serious Wikipedia page.)
- It's really crazy: this run defense looked incomprehensibly horrible for about five or six weeks. But after holding Wisconsin to 99 yards rushing, well, I wouldn't say it's a strong suit, or even a medium suit. But we're so, so much better at it than we once were.
- And we held the passing game to a relative halt, and three sacks is nothing to scoff at. NU's defense wasn't spectacular, not by a long shot. But with an offense as dynamic as the one NU has, you've got to like their chances, especially if they learn how to keep opponents from running back punts or kickoffs every other game. Without that return, it's not a game. So don't get too down on our defensive unit.
- In fact, you should be... uh, up, on Brad Phillips, who was EVERYWHERE - tackle numbers are generally difficult to interpret because they're so subjective, but 11 solo tackles, a pass breakup, a sack and a QB hurry are, like, great stats from a defender and Corey Wootton, who is really bringing the pressure from the defensive end spot in a way he just wasn't earlier in this season.
- Like I said back in October, we'd be better off just never running. Our ground game showed signs of life at points throughout the year - the past two weeks included - but it looked alive in the same way Tupac looks alive now, in that there was vague, but extraordinarily questionable, evidence that it theoretically, possibly potentially, could be not dead, but nobody would legit say "oh, well Tupac/the Northwestern running game is alive." (follow? didn't think so.) (also, allow that to be the first and last time Scott Concannon is compared to Tupac Amaru Shakur.) But we really shouldn't worry about whether or not it is alive. Outside of QB sneaks, broken plays, Dan Persa, and an occasional draw up the middle or option, we should never, ever run. And those are just to keep the defense honest, not to gain yards, although 3rd and 6 is more appealing than 3rd and 10, our offense looks just as successful on 3rd and 6 as it does on 3rd and 1.
- By the way, offensive line, stop that whole false starting thing before the bowl game. Please? You're great, we love you, but, like, stop it.
- I had a major problem with the game earlier this season where I got to the game late and saw from the stadium shuttle that the other team had already scored a touchdown. I have less of a problem with it happening to NU. Although I kind of did want to see that touchdown. But that's what highlight reels are for.
That's all I got for now. Should be some good posts this week, so stick around, fellas.
0 recs |
5 comments
|
Comments
Start Times
First, you’re complaining about 11AM start times but can’t even make a 2:30PM kickoff on time?
In any case, I felt like I’ve explained this a million different places a million different times, but I’ll give it a go again.
NU essentially has no control over the start times. They are dictated by the TV networks (ABC/ESPN and Big Ten Network) that are in place due to contracts with the conference. Since all home games are under contract, it’s entirely up to the networks as to when the games are.
ABC/ESPN gets an exclusive time window each Saturday, usually the 2:30PM slot, meaning that the rest of the games must either be at 11AM (vast majority) or at 6PM or later (night games are typically announced before the season). Note that no true night games are allowed on Nov. 1 or later by Big Ten rule (weather/sunset are reasons given by the conference).
The past 2 years NU has been lucky that the OSU-Michigan game has been slated as the ABC exclusive game the week before Thanksgiving at 11AM, and NU has had home games both years and therefore been slated at 2:30.
Overall, this whole deal is great for TV, since the Big Ten gets basically all of their games to a national cable audience (although those outside the Big Ten footprint who don’t have satellite may need a sports tier) and the conference has a ton of games on ABC/ESPN/ESPN2. The exposure is great. Unfortunately those 11AM start times aren’t as fun for fans at the games (although most other schools in the conference get 80,000 to 100,000 fans to show up for those games).
In any case, NU can’t do much about it except leave the conference, which would be stupid and would never happen. Otherwise, set that alarm clock for those 11AM games, and that makes those 2:30 (and sometimes even 6 or 7 PM) games that much more special.
--
JHodges
http://www.hailtopurple.com/jhodges/
you got me on that one.
no counterargument for my laziness and lack of shuttle-catching coordination. in my defense, i got there at around 2:37.
however:
i understand who’s in charge. i understand why our games are at 11. and i know it’s not nu-specific, and that most big ten schools have 11 am start times.
i’m saying the theory behind our games being early is flawed. i refuse to believe that the fact that there are 30,000 fans at ryan field not watching the big game on espn/abc makes an enormous dent in espn’s bottom line.
i know that it’s an economics thing and that espn/abc will never allow the big ten network to create competition for their own national game as long as they have negotiating leverage, which they probably always will. i know that if they let nu have games at 2:30, every school in the big ten would have games at 2:30, and then there would be nobody left to watch their big matchup. it’s just unfortunate, because i’m never on time to my 11 o clock classes, so the fact that i get to ryan field that early is a statement to my poor life prioritizing, and i had a great time at the game yesterday without having to screw up my sleep schedule.
so i will forever complain. i apologize for always writing things stupid enough for you to write smart, well explained things in the comment section.
by Rodger Sherman on Nov 22, 2009 11:47 PM CST up reply actions
Yes, but....
….don’t you think that this is going to be a significant part of the Big Ten’s strategy in upcoming TV negotiations?
I’m convinced that the Big Ten Network is going to say to ABC/ESPN — “Look, you get one 11 am game, one 2:30 game, and a night game August-October (and we’ll shift the night game to a second 11/2:30 slot for you when November rolls around, or if you don’t want a night game). Big Ten Network will get the other games and decide their start times, but will get to start them at 12 pm and 3:30 pm so that they don’t entirely overlap with your games and you get some exclusive windows on your games, and will not air a game competing against ABC/ESPN at night if ESPN/ABC takes a night Big Ten game. Oh, and we’ll agree if you want to not air any Big Ten games opposite Michigan-OSU.”
Under that deal, the Big Ten Network makes more money and airs more games at times that are not competing against each other (i.e. no more 3 games on Big Ten Network alternates at 11 am, when we could spread those games out), ESPN still gets good games (because they select first) and exclusive windows where they’re the only Big Ten games on and can air more SEC games (they have a huge contract together), and the schools win (particularly NU) by having slightly later start times for most games, allowing for more ticket sales, etc.
One more thing — the Tribune had an interesting column today, I think, about That School from South Bend joining the Big Ten, and how that would help TSFSB and its new coach by giving them reasonable targets (i.e. Big Ten Championship would be a big deal, whereas the only way TSFSB “succeeds” currently is by making a BCS game). If that happens, you better believe that the Big Ten Network’s leverage in these negotiations will increase, making it more likely they get more games (thus changing start times), simply due to the fact that they might have another party (NBC) to negotiate with about covering games.
It just makes too much financial sense for all involved to have more games on at different times when they’re not up against each other….so expect gametimes for NU to change then….
TV Deals
The current contracts with ABC/ESPN and the Big Ten Network started in 2007, so they won’t be up for renegotiation for a few years yet.
One complicating factor is that ABC/ESPN has deals with multiple other BCS conferences (ACC, Big East, Big XII, Pac-10, and most importantly the SEC) so they have some bargaining power on their side. Plus, their deal with the SEC that started this season is a big one and gives them a ton of games, most at night, and ESPN+ syndicates most other SEC games now.
Big Ten Commish Delaney put in a ton of effort to get a large number of Big Ten games on national TV (in that 11AM time slot) as well as securing that lucrative 2:30PM time slot for the big Big Ten game that day (although it can be moved to a night slot, like Iowa-PSU earlier this year). ABC/ESPN likely wanted the exclusivity window in order to give the big game ABC afternoon treatment.
I don’t see those stances changing much, especially since the Big Ten Network won the battle to get on the major cable carriers (it was on satellite from the start). With most cable systems carrying the overflow channels, those extra games on the BTN are non-issues – they’re available to most everyone who wants them.
Optimally, some later start times would be nice, but with more and more games going on TV somewhere, it will be more and more up to the TV folks to determine when those games will be. Remember less than 10 years ago when it wasn’t even close to a guarantee that NU games got on TV.
--
JHodges
http://www.hailtopurple.com/jhodges/
ND
Notre Dame won’t consider joining a conference in football (i.e. Big Ten) unless NBC cancels their contract, period. And despite their woes over the past 3 seasons, ratings have been holding, so don’t expect that to happen any time soon (their current contract still has some time to go, it was signed in 2007). (A lot of people apparently like to see them lose.)
Joining the Big Ten may make sense to just about everyone, but money talks and they get a steady source of revenue that they don’t have to share with anyone.
There is no way ND would join the Big Ten with their NBC deal in place. It would hurt both parties: The Big Ten wouldn’t have collective bargaining power for all of its teams (nor would it have equal revenue sharing), and ND would lose control of a good portion of its scheduling (it can now play whomever it wants wherever and whenever it wants). And, I wouldn’t be surprised if there were clauses in the current contracts that would void them if ND did join the Big Ten.
Obviously ND joining the conference would be a seismic shift, but I don’t see it happening any time soon (i.e. within 10 years).
--
JHodges
http://www.hailtopurple.com/jhodges/

by 








