Rooting Interests -- Week 10
So, the users of this site need to step up if Sippin' On Purple is going to work, so I present....Your NU-slanted "Rooting Interests" for Week 10. Yes, a column to tell you what to root for in the Big Ten. Feel free to disagree....
1. Northwestern at Iowa -- If this was an Iowa blog, I'd have to tell you who to root for in this game. But you're a Northwestern fan, which indicates you have an education, and can figure this one out on your own.
2. Wisconsin v. Indiana -- I'm going with Wisconsin in this one. If Indiana were to find its way to bowl-eligibility, some bowl might pick Indiana under the mistaken belief that they have a larger fan base than Northwestern (ummmm, they don't, at least not in football). NU plays Wisconsin at the end of the season, when NU will hopefully be on a 2-game winning streak, so we want Wisconsin to win as much as possible (and be as highly ranked as possible) before that date. Aside from rooting for Wisconsin to win, I think for the sake of the Hoosiers we should root for the game to be a blowout -- no sense raising Hoosier upset hopes into the 4th quarter, only to have them tank again for the third consecutive week.
3. Michigan State v. Western Michigan -- here's something that no national columnists/Big Ten bloggers seem to realize: Michigan State is in serious danger of not making a bowl. They're currently 4-5, with this game, @ Purdue, and at home vs. Penn State left. I don't see any way that MSU beats Penn State, so that gets them their 6th loss....one slip up to a generally improved Purdue team next week, or a 2nd slip up against an in-state MAC foe this week, and MSU is in the Rivalry Esq.'s Ro-Tel and Velveeta Queso Bowl this December. So, Cats fans, root for Western Michigan.
4. Minnesota v. Illinois -- If Minnesota wins this week, they'll get to at least 7 wins, since they play South Dakota State next week. NU may have problems getting to 7 wins given the remaining schedule (or, for that matter, 6 wins). As much as it pains me to say this, we have to root for the Illini. Really, though, this is a win-win for us either way, as a loss for Illinois officially means it's basketball season in Champaign-Urbana (7 losses = no bowl for the Zooksters).
5. Michigan v. Purdue -- The obvious choice here is Purdue, because if Purdue wins, I don't think Michigan can get a bowl-clinching sixth win over Wisconsin or Ohio State in the following weeks. In fact, we should be rooting for Purdue to win this week and next week (Michigan State), and then lose to Indiana to close out the season, as part of an elaborate plot to get NU the best bowl slot possible by making as much of the conference bowl-ineligible as possible. Plus, it's easy to root against Michigan, isn't it? And seeing RichRod squirm through another bowl-less offseason of speculation as the flames rise higher in Ann Arbor is schadenfreude at its greatest.
6. Penn State v. Ohio State -- I think we side with JoePa and Penn State on this one. Should NU become bowl-eligible, it gets into a better bowl automatically if the Big Ten ends up with 2 BCS teams. Now, there are scenarios where OSU and Iowa could be those teams, but our best bet is if an 11-1 Penn State and 11-1 Iowa (one loss courtesy of a plucky group of student athletes from the Enchanted Lakefront of Evanston) end up atop the Big Ten, with Iowa as Big Ten champs (heading to the Rose Bowl), and PSU and its large fan base ends up at another bowl site (probably the Fiesta or Orange).
Other games: root for Vandy (the "Northwestern of the SEC") to take down the eye-gouging Gators (predicted ESPN headline if that happens and Cats beat the Hawkeyes -- "REVENGE OF THE NERDS"); hope that UConn get pull an emotional victory over Cincy; root for Eastern Michigan to get its first win and Miami of Ohio and Syracuse to win to help NU's strength of schedule.
And root for Oregon and Navy, because we should always remember to spare some hate for Stanford and Notre Dame.
0 recs |
7 comments
Comments
Proudest Accomplishments
If I were to list my proudest accomplishments, somewhere in the Bottom Half of the Top 10 would be the use of the “On the Couch with the Queso Bowl (now sponsored by Ro*Tel)” as an SBNation approved metaphor for missing out on a bowl game.
And Northwestern does need a Minnesota loss. They’ll get a win against SDSU next week. If Minnesota has only six wins, I expect that Northwestern gets the Insight Bowl ahead of them (since Minnesota was there last year). If Minnesota has seven, the bowls won’t have a choice. How sad is it that Minnesota with 7 wins could go to the 3rd Best post-BCS Bowl (Champs this year) because the only remaining bowl eligible teams couldn’t get past six wins (Michigan, Northwestern, Michigan State).
http://www.rivalryesq.com/
The quintessential Big Ten smoking room.
by Bama Hawkeye on Nov 5, 2009 11:14 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Think that's bad...
…if a 7 win Minnesota team goes to the Champs Bowl, a 6 win NU team could end up in the Alamo Bowl, particularly if Purdue can pull the MSU-Michigan sweep (in which case neither team likely gets to 6 wins).
Not that I’d mind — I love hitting up San Antonio, and personally will miss the Big Ten’s affiliation with the Alamo Bowl.
by Chadnudj on Nov 5, 2009 11:43 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
thanks a lot for posting this
well done post.
the cool thing about sbnation is how much stuff readers can do. because y’all are generally smarter than i am.
by Rodger Sherman on Nov 5, 2009 11:22 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
I wholeheartedly agree with your assessment
Basically every Big Ten game on the slate impacts NU’s bowl hopes/positioning for the remainder of the season. Of course seeing Purdue and Illinois winning this week means that they hold off bowl elimination, but that means some other teams are that much closer to falling off the bowl wagon.
For NU, it will likely all come down to the Illinois game next week – the most important thing is to get bowl eligible, then worry about where you’re going. It looks like NU will likely go somewhere, though, with 2 BCS teams becoming more and more likely, and a minimum of 3 Big Ten teams becoming bowl ineligible rather shortly.
--
JHodges
http://www.hailtopurple.com/jhodges/
by jhodges on Nov 5, 2009 2:14 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Correct me if I'm wrong...
but don’t we also want BYU over Wyoming, Army over Air Force, and TCU over SD State so that there aren’t enought bowl eligible teams in the Mountain West Conference and thus a spot for us in the Humanitarian Bowl?
by NickMarkaces on Nov 5, 2009 5:25 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
in depth analysis like this is all hogwash,
we need to win here, and need some other, generally-abstract stuff out there to go OK somehow. Just do your duty: have a drink, watch the Cats. The rest is mental masturbation.
by M J Purplepants, Esq. on Nov 5, 2009 5:58 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
i'ma disagree
we need to win, yeah, but, we need other stuff to go our way as well. and scoreboard watching is just part of sports, so it’s good to know who you need to do stuff.
keep it up, chad.
by Rodger Sherman on Nov 6, 2009 1:53 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs

by 








