Northwestern vs. Creighton recap: Winning with defense
In the first half, it was the same old story for Northwestern. The offense was clicking, as the 'Cats shot 57% from the field and only committed one turnover, but Creighton was still in the game thanks to the dominant inside play of center Kenny Lawson, who looked to be on his way to 30 points and 15 rebounds. Interior defense continued to be a problem, and the halftime lead was 8 only because Lawson had to sit for a while due to foul trouble.
And in the second half, Northwestern came out ice cold, turning the ball over like crazy and forcing difficult perimeter jumpers early in the shot clock. Normally that would be a recipe for disaster, but the defense clamped down and the 'Cats actually managed to open up the lead, as they were never really threatened in the second half and won by 13.
I have to give Bill Carmody a lot of credit in this one, as his game plan was a big reason why Creighton struggled so much to score. He kept switching between the 1-3-1 zone and the match-up zone, changing it up every 4 minutes or so. All the different looks really seemed to confuse Creighton, as it often took them a while to get into their sets. The 1-3-1 in particular caused a lot of problems; the zone forced a lot of turnovers and kept Creighton almost exclusively on the perimeter.
I also have to give Luka Mirkovic credit for stepping up in the second half. In the first half, he was horrendous; Lawson was abusing him in the post and he was bricking perimeter jumpers and free throws on offense. He bounced back nicely though and was largely responsible for holding Lawson scoreless after halftime, playing solid post defense and even blocking Lawson's shot once. In the past, Mirkovic would often completely disappear after a slow start, so this was encouraging to see.
Another key was defensive rebounding. For the game, Creighton rebounded just 26% of their misses, and many of those came on a first half possession where Lawson rebounded his own miss 3 straight times before finally converting on his fourth try. In the second half, Creighton was one and done almost every time they missed, a sign that the rebounding is improving.
Player bullets
- John Shurna continues to play at an All-Big Ten level. He had 23 points on just 13 field goal attempts, and had 6 rebounds, 4 assists, 2 steals, and only 1 turnover. He set the tone for Northwestern right from the opening tip, scoring on everything from one-handed dunks in transition to NBA range 3-pointers. Shurna was so on fire early that Greg McDermott called for Shurna to be double-teamed immediately after touching the ball a few times, which I can't ever remember a coach doing. I know it's early, but I think Shurna is the favorite to lead the Big Ten in scoring, it feels like a given that he'll get at least 20 every time he steps on the court.
- Michael Thompson had his usual excellent floor game, with 3 assists and just 1 turnover, and he had 18 points on 8 of 10 shooting. Usually Juice does most of his damage from the three point line, and while he did hit 2 threes in the second half to break the game open, 6 of his field goals came on lay-ups after beating his man off the dribble.
- Drew Crawford had perhaps his worst game in a Northwestern uniform, turning the ball over 4 times in a 10 minute second half stretch (including once where he mistook a ref for one of his teammates, no seriously, that really happened). Crawford also didn't attack the basket off the dribble very much, as 7 of his 9 field goal attempts came on perimeter jumpers. This was especially disappointing because he was often being guarded by Kaleb Korver, who couldn't have stopped Crawford off the dribble had he been allowed to use a two-by-four.
- JerShon Cobb started, but played just 14 minutes and had 2 points on 1 for 4 shooting. After a bad pass early in the second half, Carmody relegated him to the bench the rest of the night, a decision that made sense because....
- The bench did a nice job chipping in, as 4 guys played double digit minutes. Davide Curletti had 7 points and 6 rebounds in 15 minutes, and looks to be a better perimeter shooter than Mirkovic. Unfortunately, he still struggles with foul trouble, as he had 4 in his 15 minutes, and he's a bit undersized when matched up against opposing centers.
- Mike Capocci and Jeff Ryan combined for 8 rebounds in their 29 minutes and played solid team defense. Both were complete non-factors in the offense, as their only scoring was a Capocci put-back lay-up. I thought Ryan may have turned the corner offensively after shooting the ball confidently against Northern Illinois, but last night he wanted no part of wide-open threes. While this duo contributes in other areas, it's a problem in the Princeton offense when the other team doesn't have to guard them on the perimeter.
- Alex Marcotullio played 10 minutes, and although he was invisible on offense, he was very active on defense, contributing a team-high 3 steals. Truth be told, he was a bit too active at times, committing a couple of unnecessary fouls. Marcotullio has good instincts going after the ball defensively, and if he can harness his aggression a little bit he could become a solid defense/energy guy off the bench to go along with 3-point shooting.
Overall, I was encouraged by what I saw last night. Good times find a way to win on off-nights, and despite a very poor second half offensively, Northwestern still cruised to victory against a decent opponent. Hopefully they can keep it up tomorrow night against Georgia Tech.
6 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Looking good
I think stopping Northwestern’s Big Three (Shurna, Thompson, Crawford) is going to be difficult for a lot of teams this year — Creighton somehow shut down Crawford (or he shut himself down with some sloppy play/bad shooting), and still Shurna and Thompson were able to carry the load (their 41 points alone almost equaled Creighton’s 52 total points).
The key for making this season special, though, will be continuing the improved bench play — getting some points/steals/key rebounds from Marcotullio, Capocci, Curletti, and Ryan will take this team to a whole new level, while allowing Juice/Shurna/Crawford to avoid foul trouble and keep their legs fresh by resting a few minutes each half on the bench.
Also — I think JerShon Cobb is still hurt or banged up a bit. Hopefully, with a bit more rest (we have another big break coming up, right?) and practice, he’ll be ready to contribute some more in the Big Ten season. And if that happens….well, watch out.
Love love that you got the 4 Factors posted
As a kenpom acolyte, nice to see that. A compelling trend in the past several years has been our Offensive Rebounding Percentage — particularly our opponents: So far in 2011, our 4 opponents have pulled down 28.0% (good for 57th in the country) of possible rebounds. That is stellar compared to the previous seasons -
2010: 33.6% (216th)
2009: 36.0% (286th)
2008: 37.5% (318th)
2007: 39.1% (325th)
2006: 35.0% (317th)
2005: 33.4% (142nd)
When Carmody speaks of defense, he’s also referring to cleaning off our own glass. I’d love for us to be around 30.0% for the season, then our defense is going to improve considerably. While offensively challenged, that’s going to be where Capocci, Curletti, and Ryan are going to have to make hay off the bench. Points are nice, but limiting opponent possessions or layups are even bigger.
The Switching Man also allows us to position better for defensive rebounding, so I’m thinking Carmody wants to make this our #1 option, and use 1-3-1 as the “changeup”. Last night was a nice example of it working on our behalf.
If the ‘Cats can piece together a nice defensive sequence (3 stops or more), we have the offensive ability to go on 8-9 pt runs, which put even more pressure on our opponents to score. Now pair that up with us switching speeds on offense where we milk it for 30-35 seconds, it’s akin to using the “ground game” in football to pound down the clock.
Once conference play happens, I’m not sure if that script is always going to play out like that. Top tier teams like MSU, OSU and Illinois have 1-2 players who can score at will and prevent that. However, I think Purdue might be susceptible to an offensive drought (that’s how we beat them in W. Lafayette a couple years back).
www.massivecreativity.com
dont worry
this site be all about kenpom
by Rodger Sherman on Nov 29, 2010 10:13 PM CST up reply actions
Grades
Guards – A-
Cobb wasn’t good, and the rest of the guards had a few defensive lapses. But that’s about all there was to complain about. Thompson buried a couple of key threes, ran the offense well, and played solid defense. Marcotullio had a decent game, too.
Forwards – B+
I read somewhere that Crawford is considered a forward, so his performance (which was not quite as bad as some say) is what knocks this unit down a bit. Shurna was dynamite again, both in the post and from beyond the arc. And Ryan played well on defense, too.
Centers – C-
Luka Mirkovic in the first half looked like he was going to earn the centers on F singlehandedly. Thankfully, he played pretty well in the second half (on both ends). And Curletti looked all right, in limited minutes. Both of them need to quit jacking threes early in the clock, though: every time they do, it costs us a chance to score.
Coaching: A-
Give Bill Carmody credit: this team was ready to play, particularly on defense. While we weren’t stellar in the first half on that end, the second half was a different story. The 1-3-1 has rarely been as disruptive as it was yesterday, and the man-to-man was actually really effective once Luka started playing decent post defense against Lawson. And the offense was once again incredibly efficient, apart from a few turnovers early in the second half.
Best played game (at least defensively) I’ve seen from the Cats in a long time. Now go out and beat Georgia Tech.
Steady
Using the 1-3-1 against Creighton is a lot different than using it against Ohio State. I still have nightmares of Buckeyes slamming home dunks.
by jackbuc@aol.com on Nov 30, 2010 11:44 AM CST reply actions

by 












