Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: This Should Encourage Juan Mata

2010 TicketCity Bowl: Texas Tech vs. Northwestern Bowl Game Preview

Lead us, oh Evan Watkins. Lead us, good sir.

Two days 'til bowling. Since you might not be on your blogs tomorrow - I personally know I'll be flyin' out to Evanston for unexplained reasons - I figured I'd get this preview up now. (Also, tomorrow is Purdue basketball day.)

I know the bowl system is silly, and that this game is meaningless, and that nobody is going - all the better for the gamethread! - and that not even Texas Tech fans are that excited, and that the game will be played in a dramatically empty Cotton Bowl. But! It's a bowl game. And Northwestern, quite frankly, has a chance to win.

Jump it up, people.

Star-divide

When we got the ball: Northwestern's offense is sort of a mess right now. Depth chart gives us Evan Watkins at quarterback with Kain Colter getting a lot of snaps, and Adonis Smith OR Stephen Simmons OR Mike Trumpy (who is injured and still of unknown status for Saturday.) If you went into a happiness-induced coma after the Iowa win, you'd be really confused. And that was three games ago. Not saying that three years from now, Watkins-Smith won't be a potent grouping - just saying they're both freshmen. Watkins hasn't looked ready and didn't seem to have the rapport one would need with his wideouts against Illinois and Wisconsin. Smith, to be honest, has looked alright, but him, Simmons, and an injured Trumpy can't carry this team.

Watkins has had over a month as this team's starting quarterback. The weeks of bowl practice were probably invaluable. And he'll be going up against the team that gave up the most passing yards in the nation, a team that genuinely struggles to stop deep passes. Watkins has a great arm - although the accuracy/decision making didn't seem to be there. I predict he looks significantly better against the hole-infested Texas Tech secondary than he did against a Wisconsin team that enjoys murdering everybody. If the run game can give NU over 100 yards, NU won't struggle to put up points.

Semi-under-the-radar player to watch: I've said it once, I've said it twice, I've said it pretty much every week this season. Stephen Simmons. He had 55 yards on 12 carries against Wisconsin - the most carries he'd received since Eastern Michigan in the second game of the 2009 season. NU will obviously look to exploit Texas Tech through the air, but has consistently kept the ball on the ground over 50 percent of the time all season long - with Trumpy possibly out, Simmons will have a bigger role in his last game than he has had since filling in for Tyrell Sutton down the stretch in 2008 - and wants to make an impact. From Teddy Greenstein at the Trib, an inexplicable quote:

"I'm about to 'clown,' so get ready," he said with a smile. "I'll act the fool. I'll do everything you can think of. I'm kind of low-key, so there's going to be a different side of me. I'm going to have fun and do some things I've seen on TV."

Stephen Simmons: acting the fool since January 1, 2010.

When they got the ball: Uh-oh.

You give up 70 points in a game. Yes, it was against Wisconsin, one of the nation's best teams, and a bunch of unfortunate turnovers gave the Badgers fantastic time of possession and great field position. But: 70 points. And they didn't even try to score for the entire fourth quarter.

Then, the next game, you play a team that lives to run and gun and move the ball downfield through the air as quickly as possible. This could get ugly.

Luckily, NU's greatest weakness - a rush defense that gives up about 8 yards per option read - likely own't be exploited as badly against Texas Tech. Baron Batch is a good back who has played for a long time, but he's not Mikel Leshoure, or those three scary Wisconsin guys. That said, NU's defense hasn't been great at stopping the pass, which is a problem, because Taylor Potts will throw a lot and has two extremely talented targets and that leads to a lot of touchdowns. That said, while NU virtually never had any success stopping the rush - basically the only good game against a good opposing running back was against Michigan State - they did occasionally neutralize opponents' passing games. Therefore, stylistically, it's a matchup that gives NU more of a chance than Illinois and Wisconsin did.  That said, it's a very small chance. Potts will likely tear holes in the Northwestern defense all game long. Give Lyle Leong two receiving touchdowns now so I don't have to watch them Saturday.

Semi-under-the-radar player to watch: Justan Vaughn. I feel like I pick him a lot for these too, like Simmons, but, whatever. It's his last game, it's in his home state, and it's his job to keep one of Texas Tech's two star wideouts - Lyle Leong or Detron Lewis - under control. He will fail. They will play very well. Considering Mabin leads the Big Ten in passes defended, Vaughn might get a high percentage of balls thrown his way, and a lot of them will likely be complete. But there will be a big difference between those guys playing very well or those guys playing very very very well. Potts could throw for 320 yards and three touchdowns, and burn Vaughn and Jordan Mabin on several occasions. But I will take that. Because Potts has the potential to throw for 475 yards and six touchdowns. And that's a big difference. Vaughn will be outmatched, in part because he's going up against two talented receivers, and in part because Texas Tech lives and dies through the air and NU will be in no way prepared to stop it. I don't blame him. It's not his fault. Passable play by him could be the difference between a win and a loss.

 

aaaaaaand my pick...

Northwestern, 35, Texas Tech, 45.

There's going to be an awful lot of offense in this game. And quite frankly, Texas Tech has the better offense. These are two incredibly similar teams: Football Outsiders' Fremeau Efficiency Index (which takes into account all of college football's 20,000 relevant possessions over the course of the season and the likely probability that each will end in a score) says Northwestern is the 66th best team in the country... and that Texas Tech is the 65th, with only .03 FEI points, which, quite frankly, I don't understand, separating them. Northwestern won't be able to stop Texas Tech's passing attack for any significant amount of time, and NU's offense isn't experienced enough to keep up with a Red Raider attack mainly comprised of seniors that's been doing the same thing - passing for lots of touchdowns - for their entire college careers. They're a tough team to prep for and I hope NU is up for the challenge. But I don't see a win in the cards.

That being said, dammit, let's end this streak. Evan Watkins, I have eternal faith in your ability to emerge as the savior of Northwestern football by doing what 60 years of quarterbacks have not been able to do. Boys, let's do this.

Go Cats, yo.

Poll
WHO YA GOT? (Two teams enter, one team leave)
Northwestern
54 votes
Texas Tech
68 votes

122 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 8 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Competition matters

A logic exercise:

1. Texas Tech put up its gaudy offensive numbers in the Big 12.
2. Big 12 defenses are suspect, to say the least.
3. HENCE: Texas Tech’s offensive numbers are inflated.

4. Northwestern put up its offensive numbers in the Big Ten, which may be the toughest defensive football conference in the country this year. (NU faced 5 defenses in the Top 50 in total defense; Texas Tech faced 3).
5. Northwestern’s offensive numbers nose-dived due to their last 2 performances, when an unpracticed Evan Watkins couldn’t move the ball well against 2 top-40 defenses.
6. HENCE: Northwestern’s offensive numbers are probably undervalued due to the tougher competition they faced, and will probably be better than their last 2 performances.

7. Favored #12 Mizzou just got beat by a decimated (by suspension) Iowa squad that NU beat.
8. Favored Baylor just got beat by Illinois.
9. Texas Tech is HEAVILY favored over Northwestern — 11 points I believe.
10. HENCE: Bet your life-savings that Northwestern beats the spread….and be strongly tempted to bet Northwestern straight up if you get better odds/a bigger payout.

by Chadnudj on Dec 30, 2010 10:12 AM CST reply actions  

Well...

….yes, against Wisconsin. And I think I might have picked Iowa, MSU and PSU against us this year (while nonetheless pointing out ways we could win/make it closer).

I’m a homer, what can I say?

But there’s no way I think a mediocre, no defense, no running game Big 12 team like Texas Tech should be 11 point favorites over Northwestern….

by Chadnudj on Dec 30, 2010 1:26 PM CST up reply actions  

you mean

a mediocre, no running game big ten team like northwestern

by Rodger Sherman on Dec 30, 2010 1:45 PM CST up reply actions  

Well....

….our “no running game” team happened in the Big Ten, which plays VASTLY superior run defense to the Big 12. Put that same Northwestern “no running game” into the defensively weak Big 12, and we might be “above average” if not better.

Indeed, if you break down the national rankings of the rush defenses the teams faced, the yards per game average allowed by those defenses, and how much NU/TT respectively got in each game (i.e. whether NU or TT surpassed the season average), you see NU was actually a GOOD running team playing against BETTER competition (and routinely surpassing the yards per game averages those defenses normally allowed), while TT was a BAD running team playing against weak run defenses (looking at the 5 best rushing defenses each team faced based on yards per game allowed):

Northwestern Running Against Opponents:
 - Iowa: 6th nationally in rushing defense, 103.5 ypg. NU rushed for 101 yards (average, basically)
- MSU: 20th nationally in rushing defense, 121.9 ypg. NU rushed for 170 yards (well above their average yards allowed).
- Illinois: 29th nationally in rushing defense, 131.3 ypg. NU rushed for 183 yards (well above average Illini allowed….and without any real passing threat because of the lack of Persa).
- Wisconsin: 30th nationally in rushing defense, 131.6 ypg. NU rushed for 161 yards (above average compared to what Wisconsin allowed, although probably average when you consider that Wisconsin was playing scrubs later in the game).
- Purdue: 43rd nationally in rushing defense, 137.9 ypg. NU rushed for 84 yards (an undeniably poor performance…but earlier in the season. Our running game gelled later in the season).

Texas Tech Running Against Opponents:
- Texas A&M: 14th nationally in rushing defense, 117 ypg. Texas Tech rushed for 96 yards (well below average).
- Oklahoma State: 41st nationally in rushing defense, 137.3 ypg. Texas Tech rushed for 175 yards (above average).
- Texas: 44th nationally in rushing defense, 138.5 ypg. Texas Tech rushed for….NEGATIVE 14 YARDS. (Seriously. That is not a misprint. They would have been better off having a holding penalty on their first carry of the day and then saying “screw it, let’s pass.”)
- Colorado: 47th nationally in rushing defense, 140.2 ypg. Texas Tech rushed for 144 yards (average, basically).
- SMU: 49th nationally in rushing defense, 141 ypg. Texas Tech rushed for 72 yards (way below average — just over half of what SMU allowed per game over the season).

Honestly, with Simmons/Smith/Trumpy/Colter/Watkins/anyone, we should be able to run against this team (we’ve run pretty effectively throughout the season, with or without Persa, against MUCH better run defenses, and improved overall in running over the season)….and CERTAINLY stop them against the run (relative to what we normally give up).

by Chadnudj on Dec 30, 2010 2:52 PM CST up reply actions  

against iowa/msu

persa (who isn’t a running back) and trumpy got 100+ yards combined. neither will play saturday.
also, tech: 4.1 yards per rush.
northwestern 3.5 yards per rush.
that’s a big difference, especially considering how much of nu’s running game came off of dan persa scrambling.

by Rodger Sherman on Dec 30, 2010 3:02 PM CST up reply actions  

YES! GIVE ME KOOL-AID! I WANT MORE KOOL-AID!

I like your thinking – and posting! Let us hope the results are as good – it will make it easier to sleep tonight.

Of course the bad news is that Rodger will NOT be able to recycle the “NU Hasn’t Won Since 1949 Column”, althought I am sure the ESPN NU haters will all be posting about how NU hasn’t won since 2011.

by nugraddad on Dec 30, 2010 1:22 PM CST up reply actions  

Look at the efficiency stats

and you’ll see that TTech actually isn’t all that good on offense (and yes, they play in the “no D” Big 12). Unfortunately, without Persa, our offense is even worse, so I actually expect a low scoring game instead of a shootout. Frankly, that’s the only chance of us winning as well, IMHO, since we don’t have the type of offense that can score 3 TDs a game right now.

by AsianD on Dec 30, 2010 2:15 PM CST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Because hip-hop references and Northwestern athletics go together like small academic institutions and gynormous athletic powerhouses.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Mask_small
Chicago's Finest
Mask_small
Super Important Spring Soccer Games
Small
Big Ten Basketball - 2012/2013
Mask_small
Defending B1G Champion NU Men's Soccer Spring Preview
Small
Recruiting Comparison
Small
Crawford should declare for NBA Draft
Small
Can I get everyone on the record about Carmody?
Small
Chris Collins
N1086180148_30136552_2108_small
The Carmody Post
Dscn0025_small
Bid Stealing Update, March 8

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

30956_1404928997786_1069228069_1222854_7361661_n_small Rodger Sherman

Editors

Small Loretta8

Authors

Small Herman