Sippin' On Purple: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: SB Nation MMA Rankings for August 2010

Iowa 78, Northwestern 65

Northwestern has had some stinkers this season, namely the narrow escapes over awful Tennessee State and Texas-Pan American, and the first half against Ohio State. But all those pale in comparison to tonight. After weeks of deluding ourselves into thinking Northwestern was an NCAA tournament team, reality finally set in, as the 'Cats were blown out by lowly Iowa in a game that was never close after halftime.

The Hawkeyes had no problems with full court pressure, matchup zone, 1-3-1 zone, man to man defense, or anything else Northwestern threw at them, shooting 50% from the field, hitting 12 of 24 3-pointers, and only turned the ball over 8 times. They also attempted 30 free throws compared to NU's 13.The defensive effort in this game was flat-out embarrassing. It's one thing to get carved up by Michigan State or Ohio State, it's quite another to make the worst offensive team in the Big Ten look like the '86 Celtics. It wasn't like Iowa was raining in 25 foot fade-aways either, they pretty much got what they wanted on the offensive end. When they weren't taking open threes, they were getting the ball inside with little resistance. Of course, calling a timeout to stem the tide might have been a good idea, but Bill Carmody kept his timeouts in his pocket almost the entire second half, not using one until the game was well in hand with under 2 minutes left. A lot more on his terrible coaching later.

The offense for Northwestern certainly wasn't awful, as they shot 44% from the field and only turned it over 6 times. But they hit just 8 of 26 three pointers and only 7 of 13 from the line. Michael Thompson led all scorers in the game with 20, and John Shurna added 16, but other than that the cupboard was pretty much bare. The 'Cats had trouble getting into a rhythm offensively the entire night, and most of the blame for that has to fall on the shoulders of Bill Carmody and his completely idiotic player rotations. First off, he decided it was going to be musical chairs at the center position the entire night. He yanked Luka Mirkovic in favor of Kyle Rowley less than 3 minutes into the game, and Rowley promptly committed two of the ugliest turnovers I have ever seen a basketball player make. So Carmody went back to Mirkovic, then to Davide Curletti, then to Ivan Peljusic, then back to Mirkovic, back to Rowley, back to Mirkovic, and on and on and on and on. All 4 of them played poorly, and it's easy to figure out why; when you're only in for 2 minutes at a time, you can't get into the flow of the game. There is absolutely no reason to go that deep into the bench except in the case of foul trouble, which wasn't the problem. Mirkovic has established himself throughout the season as by far the best center on the roster. Yes, he'd missed a couple easy lay-ups. It happens sometimes. Mirkovic is still a good rebounder, and a good passer who knows the offense well. He also could have used his size advantage to slow down the Iowa front line of Aaron Fuller and Jarryd Cole, who combined for 26 points and 18 rebounds. I really don't want to hear any Carmody apologists talking about how "he was looking for a spark" or "trying to mix things up". Please. Instead, Carmody should have tried actually being a teacher and a motivator, and helped Luka regain the solid form he's shown the last couple games. Ivan Peljusic belongs with Nikola Baran in Division 2, he is not a Big Ten center, yet he was on the court for 11 minutes tonight while one of the top rebounders in the league was warming the bench.

And as bad as Carmody botched the center rotations, that wasn't even close to the biggest substitution problem. Hey Bill, there's a player on your roster from Naperville, Illinois, who is considered by many to be the favorite for Big Ten freshman of the year. His first name is Drew. His last name is Crawford. His name is Drew Crawford. Where the hell was he in the second half? Explain it to me. The last time Northwestern fell way behind on the road against a weaker Big Ten team, Crawford almost singlehandedly brought the 'Cats back against Michigan. And tonight, he was trying to do the same thing, with 5 second half points capped off by a layup in transition to cut the deficit to 11. But then, Carmody decided to put him on the bench in favor of Mike bleeping Capocci. Now look, I'm not blaming Capocci here. The kid plays hard, and he contributed a little off the bench against Indiana. However, his offensive game is limited to lay-ups; he has no jump shot. You know how many 3-pointers Capocci has hit in his 3 year career at Northwestern? Three. In 56 career games. Crawford hit 3 in about 2 minutes in the Michigan game. Capocci is good for 5 minutes a night off the bench to provide energy and give one of the starters a brief rest. He should not be anywhere near the court when you need offense, and yet he was, providing nothing on defense with his only field goal coming on a fluky putback off an Alex Marcotullio air ball. He got 15 minutes tonight, while Crawford played a mere 22 despite not being in foul trouble. Just awful Carmody, why don't you put Reggie Hearn and Auston Nichols into the game too?

Carmody is certainly not the only reason they lost tonight. Nobody played any defense the entire game, and that's on the players. But the coaching did not give the team the best chance to win, and I can't accept that. This isn't like last year, where it was often unclear who the 5 best guys were on a given night. The 5 best players on this roster are the 5 starters, and unless there's foul trouble, they should be getting the majority of the minutes. I don't care if you're playing a high school team, when you're running out two offensive black holes down the stretch, you are not going to overcome a double digit deficit.

Overall, this game just sucked from the get-go. There are no positives to discuss, and nothing to build on. It's now going to take a miracle for Northwestern to get into the NCAA tournament, but there are still plenty of games left on the schedule, and hopefully the 'Cats can somehow right the ship and keep things from completely falling apart.

0 recs  |  Comment 11 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Before reading the article...

Just have to say Luka was flat-out awful tonight. In the first half he missed 3 close buckets (including one wide open layup). He seemed to turn the ball over or miss a shot just about any time he touched the ball. He looks so slow and lost any time he gets it down low.

That said, the alternatives didn’t do much better.

by Naming my first dog Foppa on Feb 10, 2010 11:54 PM CST reply actions  

Oh...

And I’ve never seen so many uncontested 3s in my life.

by Naming my first dog Foppa on Feb 10, 2010 11:56 PM CST up reply actions  

Awful, I don’t think I’ve ever been that upset. Devin Bawinckel, John Lickliter, Brendon Cougil, that’s a bad intramural team, yet they ate the Cats up.

by jackbuc@aol.com on Feb 11, 2010 7:02 AM CST reply actions  

Carmody's subs

Carmody’s subs were not about “looking for a spark” or “trying to mix things up.” They were simply about putting players on the court who might have been willing to put more effort and make smarter decisions. When Crawford got pulled, he had just allowed two straight uncontested 3-pointers from Bawinkle (I think) after making poor decisions in the 1-3-1 zone. He was benched for a reason. As for Mirkovic and the center rotation, what do you expect Carmody to do when none of the centers are playing well? Mirkovic was providing no presence defensively or offensively and picked up a bad foul. Rowley comes in and promptly turns the ball over twice. Curletti and Peljusic were ineffective. What’s Carmody to do? Stick with Mirkovic, who’s stinking up the joint, or try to find a solution on the bench?

Look, if Carmody had stuck with Crawford and Mirkovic despite their poor play, he’d be getting bashed for leaving them in. Sometimes players need a benching to send a message. There’s something to be said for allowing your players to play through their mistakes, but when they’re making repeatedly bad decisions and appear not to be playing with 100 percent urgency, then I think a stint on the bench is appropriate.

I can see where you’re coming from, but your pissy writing doesn’t serve you well.

by Herman on Feb 11, 2010 9:38 AM CST reply actions  

no, i would not be criticizing carmody for the revolutionary idea of putting his best players in the game down the stretch. what message does putting crawford on the bench for the final 10 minutes send? “I want to go to the NIT?” “I was betting Iowa +3?” Really, explain it to me. You send a message by benching him for 1 or 2 minutes, not the last 10.

As for Mirkovic, I already suggested what he should do. Teach and motivate during the game, maybe get him to focus on defense (like the blocked shot he had against Cole) and rebounding (which he does better than any of the other centers).

You are not going to come back on the road with Mike Capocci and Ivan Peljusic on the floor. Anyone who’s watched this team for 5 minutes could see that, and that’s why I am “pissy” or whatever in my recaps when the team loses in part of because of glaring coaching errors. I don’t understand why so many fans blindly defend Carmody and his terrible overall record, yes he’s been better the last couple years but people react so poorly to anyone ripping him at all, I just don’t get it.

by Loretta8 on Feb 11, 2010 10:32 AM CST up reply actions  

blindly defend?

Fine, we can agree to disagree that Carmody’s substitution patterns were justified/crazy. I will note that the Daily Herald in its game recap quoted Carmody as saying the players failed to follow the scouting report. Perhaps that is why certain players got benched.

As for “blindly” defending Carmody, some perspective here. Carmody inherited a program that was in complete shambles with player defections following Kevin O’Neill’s tenure, on top of a horrendous lack of tradition/success and facilities that pale in comparison to our BigTen brethren. This was never going to be an overnight turnaround job.

As you allude to, several of the players in our rotation would not sniff any playing time on other competitive BigTen teams. I believe this extends to some of our starters, even. Given the talent gap that exists, I believe (and I realize not everybody agrees) that Carmody has done an excellent job in coaching his teams to be competitive, and in some cases, win games that we should have no business winning. This is not “blindly” defending him. This is taking a look at the roster and the competition and being realistic. Carmody has been the MOST successful coach we’ve ever had, even factoring in those terrible seasons a couple of years ago. None of the coaches we’ve had in the last three decades come even close.

I could go on, but I’ve made my point. As a Carmody supporter, I am hardly “blindly” defending him. I think there is ample evidence to believe in him and his coaching philosophy. Clearly, you disagree, and that’s fine. I just don’t think that each loss you attribute to poor coaching warrants a reflexively pissy post.

by Herman on Feb 11, 2010 1:04 PM CST up reply actions  

i’d hate to think what it would take for people to be upset with Carmody. apparently a 49-111 Big Ten record is cause for celebration. god forbid i get “pissy” about a coach with that record who finally, after years of recruiting D3 caliber players, has managed to actually bring in some Big Ten level talent, then forgets he has that talent and goes back to the D3 caliber scrubs who had been relegated to the pine where they belong.

Look, I get that his predecessors have sucked. I get that this is an historically inept program. But making the NIT is not something to get excited about. It’s embarrassing how many people think an under .500 Big Ten record is a good thing. When he first took over, you’re right, the program was in shambles .I thought he did well his first couple years and seemed to be headed in the right direction. But it’s year 10, and he hasn’t come close to making the NCAA tournament yet. If someone had told you the day Carmody was hired that in 10 years, he would make 0 NCAAs and only 2 NITs, would you have still wanted him hired? No, of course not.

Last year’s team and this year’s team are certainly a step in the right direction, as he finally has Big Ten level talent. That’s why I find it even more frustrating when I see glaring coaching errors. In the past, no coach in the country could have won with the awful rosters Carmody had, so I didn’t get too upset about losses. But last night, his team had way more talent than Iowa, and yet they got blown out in part because he didn’t put his best players on the court. How are you not furious after that loss?

I really just don’t get it.

by Loretta8 on Feb 11, 2010 1:37 PM CST reply actions  

How do you know I wasn’t furious? I was plenty upset- but more at the on-court performance than I was about any substitution patterns. This game should have been an easy win. Our team, for whatever reason, pissed away a great opportunity for us to stay in the thick of an NCAA bid. I saw mental blunders, poor shooting and a general lack of sharpness on the part of the players. And yes, I agree that Carmody could have used a timeout to stop the bleeding at some point.

You’re pissed at Carmody. Fine, I get that. I was pissed that Crawford left Bawinkel wide open twice in a row. I wondered why Crawford wasn’t being assertive and driving with the basketball, like he usually does. I was pissed that Mirkovic was blowing layups and getting manhandled in the post. I was pissed that none of the center subs seemed to be any better. I’m not absolving Carmody of blame, but I don’t think the substitution patterns are the culprit. To me, Carmody was doing what he could to find a lineup that could get back into the game.

As for Carmody’s record, who says I’m celebrating 49-111? I could paint you as “blind” for being unable or unwilling to acknowledge what Carmody has done with the cards that he’s been dealt. I agree with you that our BigTen record is terrible. But what’s the alternative to Carmody? Who’s available on the job market that we could hire?

Maybe we get lucky and hire some young assistant coach with something to prove who through the force of his personality and coaching skills takes us to the NCAA tournament. What are our chances of getting that coach and having him succeed at a greater rate than Carmody?

Or maybe we stick with Carmody for the long haul, let him establish some stability in a program that hasn’t seen stability for decades, and take a longer view? Yeah, yeah, in our age of instant gratification, who does that, right? Well, we have, and whether you agree with the decision or not, our program is on an upward trend.

It’s taken 10 years for Carmody to finally get us in the vicinity of NCAA tournament contention (9, if you’re generous and count last year). Yes, that is far longer than we might have hoped when we first hired him. This is not a cause for celebration, but I think you have to at least acknowledge what an uphill climb this program has had. And not in a dismissive “Sure our history is littered with failure, but Carmody’s record sucks” way.

Fundamentally, we disagree on how many years Carmody should have gotten before being on the firing line. I wouldn’t have disagreed with the decision to fire Carmody three years ago. But Carmody’s here, and I don’t think those of us who support him should be painted as celebrating mediocrity or getting excited about the NIT or lacking passion or any of the other inane insults that get lobbed our way.

by Herman on Feb 11, 2010 2:53 PM CST up reply actions  

you make some good points here

The program is on an upward trend, no doubt about it. The question though, is whether or not he can make them a real NCAA tournament contender (not a fake NCAA contender if/when they go to 96 teams). I think it’s a big if given his track record. The recruiting is finally where it needs to be, let’s see if he can start getting the most out of his roster every night.

I’m certainly not in favor of firing him right now, as you’re right that talented coaches across America won’t exactly be lining up for the Northwestern job. However, I think he should be on a pretty short leash going forward. I mean if he can’t put up a winning Big Ten record next year with Coble, Shurna, Crawford, Thompson and Cobb, it’s doubtful he ever will.

Sorry I came across as harsh in some of these comments, you’re clearly a passionate fan and I got carried away due to the frustration of that disastrous loss. Thanks for reading and commenting.

by Loretta8 on Feb 11, 2010 4:15 PM CST up reply actions  

I’m on board with the short leash. Next season, he’ll have his most talented roster ever. I do think we’ve been playing way over our heads for much of the season, considering the loss of Moore to graduation and then the stunning injuries to Coble and Ryan. But if this roster is capable of being on the fringe of NCAA contention, next year the addition of Cobb and the return of Coble should be enough to take this team over the top.

There are always extenuating circumstances with every hiring/firing. At some point, those extenuating circumstances can no longer be used as excuses, and bottom line results are required. The question with Carmody is when that point is reached. For some fans, that grace period expired seasons ago. I’m in the camp that thought it would take at least two full four-year recruiting cycles, maybe even three, to get this program out of the dregs.

So now we’re in year 10 of the Carmody era. We’re starting to turn a corner, but we’re not yet established enough that we’re clear of sliding back into mediocrity or worse. Last night’s loss is an all-too-painful reminder of that, and Carmody can’t afford too many more of those. I’m disappointed that our progress has not been linear, but here we are.

At any rate, I do think that for the most part, you are even-handed in your treatment of Carmody. I just happen to disagree with your assessment that his substituting played a big factor in this loss. But I appreciate the work you (and Rodger) put into this blog, as there can never be too much coverage of NU sports.

by Herman on Feb 11, 2010 4:37 PM CST reply actions  

Scheduling

I think we were ill-prepared for the Big Ten season by scheduling so many cushy home games, instead of getting out of the road a few more times. I know that we tried with Notre Dame (and Iowa St.), and the home-and-away series with Stanford. But we’ve been awful on the road this year far too many times (the entire game last night, all of the tOSU game, second half @Sparty, first half @MIN). I can’t help but think that a little more courage in the scheduling could pay dividends later in the season. Given the talent we have returning next year, I think we need to redouble our efforts to step it up next fall.

by RotoJeff on Feb 11, 2010 8:26 PM CST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Because hip-hop references and Northwestern athletics go together like small academic institutions and gynormous athletic powerhouses.
Start posting about the Wildcats »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Sippin' On Purple Big Ten Pick'em League
Small
Northwestern Goes 8-4 (4-4) in 2010?
Walkonlespaul_small
Out for the Week
Img00167_small
Just a little help for a Visitor
Small
Places to eat near Northwestern
Small
Lets Customize Iowa!
Doll_head_small
i know i just posted and all....
Doll_head_small
A Little Backround on Dan Persa

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SBNation.com Recent Stories

Virginia Tech quarterback Tyrod Taylor celebrates with the crowd in the final moments of the fourth quarter of an NCAA football game against Tennessee Sunday, Dec. 13, 2009 in Atlanta.  (AP Photo/John Bazemore)

Week 1 College Football Buffet: Previewing Every Game So You Know Which To Consume

Utah kicker Joe Phillips (39) kicks the winning field goal during overtime of an NCAA college football game against Pittsburgh on Thursday, Sept. 2, 2010 in Salt Lake City. Utah upset No. 15 Pittsburgh 27-24. (AP Photo/Steve C. Wilson)

Utah Upsets No. 15 Pittsburgh In Opening Night Overtime Thriller, 27-24

HONOLULU - SEPTEMBER 2:  Ronald Johnson #83 of the University of Southern California Trojans runs in for a touchdown against Corey Nielsen #8 of the University of Hawaii Warriors during first half action at Aloha Stadium September 2 2010 in Honolulu Hawaii. (Photo by Kent Nishimura/Getty Images) +2 updates

Lane Kiffin Is Victorious In Debut, No. 14 USC Wins In A Shootout At Hawaii, 49-36

More from SBNation.com >


Managers

Walkonlespaul_small Rodger Sherman

Editors

Small Loretta8