One Less Day Til Football 2010, Post 3: Northwestern's Wide Receivers
48 days left? My advice: go see Inception 48 times.
Days left til Football: 48
One Less Day Til Football, Post 3: Wide Receiver
First, some Terminology:
Not all Northwestern wide receivers are created equal. Some would interpret this statement to mean that I believe that "possession receivers" are in fact, the possessions of other, more equal receivers, but, that's enough snide commentary on the more depressing aspects of world history. What I mean is that not all NU wide outs are expected to fulfill the same role.
Over the past few years, we've seen a few distinct roles emerge in the NU scheme, characterized to guys specific skillsets. Andrew Brewer and Zeke Markshausen were not interchangeable: they essentially played different positions, though they were both wide receivers. And these positions are assigned less by skill level than skill set: the "most talented" receiver could end up in whichever role fits him, whether that be outside or in the slot. With a little bit of youtube analysis, I've characterized what I believe to be the four roles NU incorporates into their offense, and the letter NU seems to have assigned to that position.
(Note: I do not have any sort of football knowledge, but you'll probably figure this out by the third paragraph.)
1. "The Ross Lane"
Role: Play on the outside, be tall, and basically just repeatedly continue to try to beat the opponent deep.
2. "The Eric Peterman"
Role: The featured slot guy, generally the one who will get the majority of passes thrown his way over the course of the season.
3. "The Rasheed Ward"
Role: Run a milliondy billion crossing routes until your legs fall off. If the first option fails, this guy (or the running back) will be there as the second option for the QB to hit when things don't go to plan. Must be capable of playing in either the slot or as a lone receiver on one side of the formation.
4. "The Fourth Guy"
Role: Typically, NU's spread puts four players out wide. However, about half the time, this fourth wide player will be a superback or running back. Still, every once in a while, NU needs a fourth wide receiver - typically on the outside, for some reason - to come in and run little dumpy patterns to demand attention and open up space for bigger routes.
These are what I have determined to be the seasons of NU wide receiving.
NU, being football people, have their own system for referring to these four positions: Z, Y, X, and H. This is consistent with your average football terminology: Z is an outside receiver who plays off the line of scrimmage, Y is an inside receiver typically referred to as the "slot" guy, H is an always the innermost receiver, meaning he's either in the slot on a side with two receivers, or even further inside than the Y receiver on a side with three receivers, and X is an outside wide receiver who plays on the line of scrimmage. However, looking at the way these terms have been used at NU, it's not a good representative of how pivotal the player is to the program: for example, in 2008, Eric Peterman was listed as the starting Y receiver, and Andrew Brewer was listed as the H. Peterman was NU's featured receiver, Brewer battled injuries, but even when healthy, was often replaced by Tyrell Sutton in the slot. That is to say, in 2008, the Y receiver was hugely important, while the H receiver was barely noticeable.
In 2009, Jeremy Ebert was listed as the Y receiver, while Zeke Markshausen was listed as the H. Ebert was barely present for large swaths of the season, while Markshausen had the second most receptions in school history. That is to say, the Y receiver was barely noticeable, while the H receiver was historically good.
Saying Peterman and Ebert filled the same role because they were both Y receivers, or Brewer and Markshausen, doesn't make much sense to me. They each play the same "position", but from year to year, those positions have different roles.
Another wrinkle is that NU has eliminated the H receiver from this year's two-deep, which I'd interpret as indicating that Drake Dunsmore at superback will essentially replace the need for a fourth wide receiver on most four- and five-wide plays. So, for the rest of this post, I will use my highly flawed terminology to describe what I expect to happen next year, instead of using NU's letter terminology. Sue me if you want to.
Who did it last year?:
The Ross Lane: This role was filled by Andrew Brewer, and he did so well with it that in future, I'll call this position "The Andrew Brewer." Brewer was great at creating space between him and his man on deep balls, and worked this to the tune of 925 yards, the fourth most in school history.
The Eric Peterman: Zeke Markshausen was another guy who, to a certain extent, came to redefine his role. While Peterman was the feature receiver in his years at NU, Markshausen shared spotlight duties with Brewer, bringing down way more receptions, but for less yardage, the quintessential possession receiver out of the slot. As noted, he brought down 91 receptions for 858 yards, which would've led the team in 2008 - while never pulling down a catch of more than 30 yards.
The Rasheed Ward: With Brewer and Markshausen highly competent at their positions, the dump-off guy gig got a little bit of slack cut towards him. But Sidney Stewart was highly servicable as well. Like Ward before him, Stewart did a good job of being semi-noticeable for most of the beginning of the season, only to explode at the end, with both his touchdowns and 90-plus yard receiving days coming in the season's last two games. Overall, very Sheed-y performance from Sid.
The Fourth Guy: This role was seemingly very evenly split between Demetrius Fields and Jeremy Ebert, who had eerily similar stat lines for the season.
Who's got next: Let's go role-by-role, again. NU has only four returning receivers who have career receptions, so, there's not much to go by.
The Ross Lane: The logical choice seems to be Jeremy Ebert, which is weird, because height is big in the outside position, and before writing this post, I assumed he was 5'11, but NUsports has him at 6 feet, and ESPN has him at 6'1.
Ebert, you may remember, looked good as a freshman two years ago in limited duty, reeled in two touchdown grabs, including one in his first collegiate game, causing my friends and I to remark how weird it was that we were about to be freshmen while watching the game and this kid already had a touchdown. (We didn't know he was a redshirt.) Although his stats increased as a sophomore, he seemed to be going Roeper on us and regressing as a player: he had a hip injury, and although he played in every game, he didn't bring in any touchdowns and only recorded two games with more than two catches. But Ebert was clearly the feature of the spring game, bringing in a way-team-high 49 yards receiving, so, look to him to be a a feature player in the 2010 season.
Ebert's depth-chart backup is Charles Brown, a junior who had eight receptions last year, all in a four game stretch in the middle of the year. All you need to know about Charlie is that he isn't our kicker, and our holder will not be a malevolent girl insistent on wrecking her team's chances for salvaging special teams points.
Sorry, Charles Brown. I'm sure you never get this joke. You're a good wide receiver.
The Eric Peterman: Sidney Stewart is one of only two seniors on the team's wide receiving corps, and has played on both the inside and outside, and seemed promising while doing so. I'm not sure where NU plans on playing him - they curiously have him listed as the Z, or outside, receiver on the team website, which is where the majority of his experience last year came, while Stewart's profile page on NUsports says he'll be an inside receiver - but wherever they do, he'll be a huge factor. He's NU's most experienced wide out, hands down, and he's got one season to step it up after having been an understudy for three years. I expect him to lead the team in receptions.
Also, that picture of him up top taken after the Iowa game is really awesome. He was probably singing the fight song, but I imagined him singing either the song he's pictured singing or "I Believe I Can Fly" judging from his facial expression of pure joy.
His backup on the depth chart is Drew Moulton, a redshirt freshman who looked very good in the spring game - Markshausen-esque, getting a team high four receptions and not dropping any balls I can recall, which is more than I can say about pretty much any other young wide receiver on the team. I wouldn't be surprised to see Moulton get some play at the fourth wide receiver spot.
The Rasheed Ward: Demetrius Fields seems perfectly suited for this role from what we saw of him in his freshman campaign. Everybody's second favorite Fields probably isn't ready to step into the primetime yet, but could work wonders as a third option, running the aforementioned milliondy billion crossing routes. His backup on the depth chart is Brendan Barber, a walk-on sophomore about whom I know nothing.
The Fourth Guy: As noted, NU has removed the fourth wide receiver role from their post-spring two-deep, so, expect healthy doses of Drake Dunsmore split out. But I also expect Drew Moulton get some playing time - I like his style. There's also Brown, and Lee Coleman, a senior, whose spring game escapades featured as many dropped passes that went in and out of his hands as I have hands, that is, if I were a genetic freak with three hands, because he dropped three passes in one spring game, which is impressive.
Sum that up in one sentence (the short attention span version of this post) : Ebert and Stewart should be the main receivers, with Demetrius Fields as a major player as well.
Is that/are these improvements?: Who knows? (THIS. THIS IS THE ANALYSIS YOU COME HERE FOR.) If you'd told me last year, "Andrew Brewer and Zeke Markshausen will be a more effective receiving corps than Eric Peterman, Ross Lane, and Rasheed Ward," first, I'd stop listening to you and walk away, then I'd ask you if that was actually how you pronounced the guy with the long last name's name, because I guessed that it was "Marchausen". I'm starting to get the sense that any purple-clad receiver can eventually be a decent filler-inner at any of the four roles listed above: pretty much everybody we bring in is of a certain level athletically, and for the most part over the past few years, have had very sure hands. They're not going to make spectacular grabs - Lane/Brewer aside - but work the spread's passing trees to find space and catch when thrown to. Brewer and Markshausen ended up having a phenomenal year, better than any individual years put up by their immediate predecessors, but was that because of their great skill, or because they were playing with a better passer on a team lacking a running game that needed to put the ball in the air? Or was it because they were such good wide receivers, the team didn't need to use third, fourth, and fifth options like they had in the past, thus diluting the stats?
Last year, NU manufactured a great passing attack from a vast pile of seeming nothingness: a formerly benched quarterback, an oft-injured QB-turned-WR, and a guy with one career reception became one of the best statistical units NU has ever had. Now we have a first-time starter at QB in Dan Persa, Jeremy Ebert, who was injured last year after having played quarterback in high school, Sidney Stewart, who has never been a featured receiver, and essentially nobody else. If lightning strikes twice, perhaps those four roles Pat Fitzgerald have crafted out and their specific jobs in the spread offense have more to do with NU's passing success than the individual skill of the guys he brings in, and next year, this post will be 48 words long.
We'll see. (Hopefully, for your sake and mine, and Sidney Stewart's it will be 48 words long.)
22 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I'd take a page outta Dodgeball
Rename the Peterman role as “Marksman”
and rename the lane role as… “Brewer. Lane. Blane”
i like it!
obviously, i’m looking forward to calling position no. 3 “rasheetrius”
by Rodger Sherman on Jul 20, 2010 1:43 PM CDT up reply actions
If Fitz has any sense of humor
(other than injuring Iowa players and laughing at their pain) he’ll send Charles Brown out for a fake PAT in garbage time.
by Batman42 on Jul 20, 2010 10:50 AM CDT via mobile reply actions
Problem
Fitz could call whatever play he wants, but to Charles, all adults sound like muted trumpets making wah-wah noises.
by Rodger Sherman on Jul 20, 2010 11:13 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions
Evolution of NU Spread
It’s very interesting to look back at the evolution of the NU spread offense since it was instituted 10 years ago and see how things have changed. I may write up my own commentary on this but I’ll provide some highlights here.
Initially, the spread was very run-oriented: look at the rushing numbers that Damien Anderson, Jason Wright, Noah Herron, and Tyrell Sutton put up. The receivers were a key part, but nobody put up huge numbers since the focus was still very much on rushing. And the spread truly “spread the ball around” to different receivers, keeping the receiving stats from the early ’00s lower.
When Fitz took over as head coach, coincidentally NU also got a new OC after Mike Dunbar left for Cal. The new OC was Garrick McGee, who was a collegiate QB and previously the QB coach. That year NU also had to deal with newcomers on the OL, and it became clear that the focus was shifting to a pass-heavy spread offense.
This continued in ‘07 that included two crazy games in terms of passing (MSU and Minnesota). Nagging injuries to RB Tyrell Sutton didn’t help matters.
In ‘08 Fitz brought in a new OC, McCall, and despite trying to run a more balanced attack in recent years (see the number of rush attempts versus Towson and EMU this past season), the complete lack of a reliable running back and an OL that didn’t do very well at run blocking forced NU into a pass-happy attack. See Outback Bowl.
This has resulted in WRs putting up big numbers, despite the fact that the ball still gets spread around pretty well. Lane/Peterman/Ward were a reliable trio and benefited from the increasing in passing starting 4 seasons ago. Brewer likely would have been in the mix earlier if not for a broken arm that cost him a season due to the injury. Markshausen did indeed “come from nowhere” but it’s not like nobody predicted it. (also check out my twitter feed from around August 2009 when I tweeted to BTN’s Dave Revsine that the breakout player for NU would be Markshausen, I can’t find the link right now though).
Expect more of the same this year, since it doesn’t look like the running game will instantly get back to where it was in the early ’00s (see your earlier post on RBs). Expect a lot of “dink and dunk” passing in order to move the ball (which is basically a substitute for the running game) while still moving the ball downfield (although Persa does need to prove himself there).
Ebert will put up much bigger numbers this year, I would guess that he’ll have the most receptions this season.
I expect Stewart to be the downfield man. He has good speed and has been waiting his turn.
Demetrius Fields looked good in limited action last year, expect to see him featured in a mixed type role. He’ll get a good amount of catches close to the line of scrimmage and near the sideline, but will also go deep from time to time.
And, as seen in the Outback Bowl, Dunsmore is really great with the ball. Expect him to be great in short to medium depth passing in a slot TE role.
In terms of backups, guys will get catches, but I’m not sure how much playing time there will be since there is a lot of youth on the 2nd line of the 2-deep. Moulton and Barber are intriguing- they have talent but we’ll see if they can show it off on the field. We may see a good amount of Brown, especially since he’s had a lot of good backup experience over the years. Finally, don’t expect to see a lot of catches from Rooks – he is primarily a blocking TE who lines up tight to the formation.
IMHO, I think these guys are at least as good as last year’s WR corps. The main difference will likely be the QB throwing to them, though. Hopefully Persa can replicate or better Kafka’s coming-of-age that we saw last year.
--
JHodges
HailToPurple
damn
this comment is essentially better than my post. first off, you should be shot for calling markshausen as a breakout receiver.
i think the big question is whether stewart or ebert – or both – emerges as the feature receiver. i think the bigger question is whether dan persa can hit a player downfield, because kafka could find brewer regularly, but persa – towson td aside – might not be able to, regardless of who’s back there.
by Rodger Sherman on Jul 20, 2010 1:45 PM CDT up reply actions
looking at these guys on paper, they don’t seem impressive, but every year they seem to find guys to step up, so we’ll see.
You never know what'll happen in the spread!
"He's the straw that makes the drink go."
by Thelonious Dunk on Jul 20, 2010 4:52 PM CDT up reply actions
what happens in the spread...
stays in the spread. and is disturbing, and generally involves zeke markshausen.
by Rodger Sherman on Jul 20, 2010 8:32 PM CDT up reply actions
Look out, Dan Persa.
Keep that head up, kid.
"He's the straw that makes the drink go."
by Thelonious Dunk on Jul 21, 2010 1:02 AM CDT up reply actions
Great Post
Best one all year. I confess that I am a sucker for the “Best Name on Team X” thing you do, but this is the most I learned about college football that I didn’t already know by just watching tons of games. I’d give some sort of a hip-hop shout out reference, but the only one to come to mind is (and I’m dating myself), Montel Jordan, This is How We Do It.
thanks
not much longer until we get some name of the week goodness, and nothing wrong with montell.
by Rodger Sherman on Jul 21, 2010 10:55 AM CDT up reply actions
Or even more!
You seem savvy enough to pull together a more complete profile on the school. Mostly of things we can laugh about: stereotypes, hot/ugly women, infamous alumni/incidents, yknow… the HARD NEWS.
Frosh?
No love for the Freshman? I’m guessing that one of Jones, Lawrence or Hall cracks the two deep and makes some plays. Don’y forget all three are on campus early for summer school and to pick up the offense.
you know
if there’s one position where freshmen could figure in, wr would be it. but i don’t know enough about the individual guys to speculate, especially considering how rarely fitz has freshmen contribute in non-special teams roles. venric mark is also somebody who has been bandied about effecting the special teams play – really wouldn’t be surprised to see him returning kicks or punts.
by Rodger Sherman on Jul 21, 2010 10:16 PM CDT up reply actions
you know
i have no idea what the difference is and i’m not ashamed to admit it. screw english.
by Rodger Sherman on Jul 22, 2010 10:42 AM CDT up reply actions
you get a...
medill C- (since your facts are correct but your English is lacking)
--
JHodges
HailToPurple
Not sure about some comparisons...
I’m not sure I agree with your comparing Brewer and Lane. They both had bigger frames, yes. But Lane wasnt much of a speed guy, whereas Brewer was. In instances where Brewer would catch a deep ball in space and either gain significant yardage after the catch or take it the distance, Lane would have been caught from behind from a defender.
However, Lane was a more physical receiver with more toughness, and I would see he was more sure-handed. While Brewer made some spectacular catches, he also had a fair amount of drops. I would actually argue that Dunsmore is a more similar type of receiver to Lane than Brewer, although Dunsmore is a superback.
Similarly, I dont agree fully with the Peterman/Markshausen comparison. Peterman I would say had much more speed and was more agile with the ball in his hands.
very true!
but i’m not saying they’re the same player. obviously they have different talents and skill levels, and different things they’re good at. i’m just saying the roles the northwestern offense asked them to complete were similar.
lane’s job was to play on the outside and go deep from time to time. peterman’s job was to be consistently open for short passes and get the majority of the receptions on the year.
even though brewer was much better at getting those deep balls and markshausen couldn’t do much once he caught the ball, the gist of what they were asked to do was similar, and i’d expect the same out of stewart/ebert this year.
by Rodger Sherman on Jul 22, 2010 10:44 AM CDT up reply actions

by 














